“Black is not a color, but the absence of color.” Or, even
better: “Darkness is the absence of
light.” I love that.
At some deep level, this makes excellent and hope-inducing
sense. The concept that “darkness is the absence of light” implies that the
default position, the natural state of reality, is light. Not dark. So, it
ain’t so much about the light cutting through, painfully penetrating the
darkness, but rather, the natural state—is light, the absence of which, is not
natural at all.
And yes, my physicist
friends and their astrophysicist/microphysicist brethren will contradict this
point with telescopic evidence of deep space and sub-atomic photography, where
blackness and emptiness are the oceans to the observable islands of pinprick
galaxies and unimaginably tiny matter.
Of course this is beautifully factual, as the evidence
provides. And the presence of such
“infinite” blackness doesn’t wrankle my light-based sense of reality in the
least. We share an underwhelming understanding of the concept of “infinite.”
And most physicists—scientists and artists of any discipline worth their salt
agree that: “what we know is
infinitesimal compared to what we don’t.”
You might add: “what we experience
is infinitesimal compared to what we don’t.” As such, the potential for the
abundance of light is…well, infinite.
So…I agree that what we can see out there in greater outer
space, and down there in the sub-atomic landscape, is dark…giving the
impression that darkness is the norm. But I know from my own life, my practical
living experience—all 47 years of it—that what is observable, knowable, even,
is but a tiny representation of the larger truth beneath what senses can
observe, much less what we’re able to articulate. Try explaining to a stranger how
much you love your wife. Or child. Or Mother. Or golden retriever. Words quickly fail. As do senses. As does
intellect. …When we utter the word “infinite” we are mentioning the presently
unknowable. And not knowing something doesn’t make it untrue any more than
knowing something necessitates its truth. At one point in our history, we
“knew” the Earth was flat. And generations of mariners behaved accordingly.
What we think we know is as discombobulating as what don’t think we know. Lots of room for light.
…When my youngest son was a toddler he somehow escaped his
car seat, which was securely strapped into the backseat of our sea-foam green
Taurus station wagon. I was driving, my wife in the passenger’s seat. No one
else in the car. In the middle of a left turn at the intersection of Carlton
Avenue and 14th Street, the driver’s side back door flew open, my
son clinging like a barnacle to the door handle, his legs dangling a few inches
off the pavement, the sound of rolling tires, horrifying.
Instantaneously, my wife’s mouth opened in a scream and she
exploded into the backseat like a torpedo, her body stretched over the
seatback, feet on the dashboard, arms reaching, grabbing, then purchasing.
Thankfully, she wasn’t wearing her seatbelt. I pulled the car over next to
Skutevik’s and sat there, hunched over the steering wheel, listening to my wife
gasping, my son slowly whimpering, casual traffic passing, heads turning.
“How did that
happen!?” my wife screamed, cried, begged to know.
“No idea,” I replied.
“Well, how’d he get out?”
“No idea,” I replied.
“Well, how’d he get out?”
“How’d you catch him?”
The distinction between light penetrating the darkness and
darkness stabbing into the light.
Wow, that's good!
ReplyDelete